• Home
  • Matt Richtel
  • A Deadly Wandering: A Tale of Tragedy and Redemption in the Age of Attention

A Deadly Wandering: A Tale of Tragedy and Redemption in the Age of Attention Read online




  DEDICATION

  For my family

  EPIGRAPH

  We have Paleolithic emotions, medieval institutions, and godlike technologies.

  E. O. WILSON

  CONTENTS

  Dedication

  Epigraph

  Prologue

  PART I: COLLISION

  CHAPTER 1 Reggie

  CHAPTER 2 The Toll

  CHAPTER 3 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 4 Reggie

  CHAPTER 5 Terryl

  CHAPTER 6 The Toll

  CHAPTER 7 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 8 Terryl

  CHAPTER 9 Reggie

  CHAPTER 10 Reggie

  CHAPTER 11 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 12 Reggie

  CHAPTER 13 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 14 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 15 Terryl

  PART II: RECKONING

  CHAPTER 16 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 17 Terryl

  CHAPTER 18 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 19 Reggie

  CHAPTER 20 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 21 Terryl

  CHAPTER 22 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 23 The Lawmakers

  CHAPTER 24 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 25 Reggie

  CHAPTER 26 Terryl

  CHAPTER 27 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 28 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 29 Reggie

  CHAPTER 30 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 31 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 32 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 33 Terryl

  CHAPTER 34 Reggie

  CHAPTER 35 Hunt for Justice

  PART III: REDEMPTION

  CHAPTER 36 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 37 Reggie

  CHAPTER 38 Hunt for Justice

  CHAPTER 39 The Lawmakers

  CHAPTER 40 The Lawmakers

  CHAPTER 41 Justice

  CHAPTER 42 The Lawmakers

  CHAPTER 43 Justice

  CHAPTER 44 Reggie

  CHAPTER 45 Redemption

  CHAPTER 46 Reggie’s Brain

  CHAPTER 47 Terryl

  CHAPTER 48 Redemption

  CHAPTER 49 The Neuroscientists

  CHAPTER 50 Reggie

  Epilogue

  Author’s Note

  Acknowledgements

  Index

  About the Author

  Also by Matt Richtel

  Credits

  Copyright

  About the Publisher

  PROLOGUE

  Are you comfortable, Reggie?”

  “Yep.”

  Reggie Shaw lies on a medical bed, his head inches from entering the mouth of a smooth white tube, an MRI machine. He’s comfortable, but nervous. He doesn’t love the idea of people peering into his brain.

  Next to the machine stands a radiology technician in blue scrubs, her hair pulled tightly into a bun. She scans the room to make sure there are no errant pieces of metal. The MRI, with sixty thousand times the strength of the earth’s magnetic force, is a kind of irresistible magnet. A small pair of scissors, if accidentally left out, could be sucked across the room into the tube at forty miles an hour.

  Reggie, twenty-six, has removed his clothes and left outside his keys, and the iPhone he keeps so regularly in his left front pocket it leaves a faint outline on the jeans. With his head at the edge of the machine, he wonders whether the permanent retainer on his bottom teeth, the product of a particularly nasty clash in a recreational football game in high school, could get yanked through his head. The technician, Melody Johnson, assures Reggie he’ll be okay.

  She walks to the left of the machine and from a table lifts an odd-looking helmet, a cross between something that might be worn by an astronaut and Hannibal Lecter.

  “I’m going to place this over your head.” She fits the white helmet over Reggie’s face, clipping the sides down to the bed. Inside the helmet, there’s a small mirror. Images can be projected into it in such a way that Reggie, lying flat on his back, stuffed in the tube, will be able to see them.

  The hum of the whirring machinery is so loud that Reggie wears earplugs. The MRI works by sending massive amounts of magnetic energy into the person’s body. This excites hydrogen atoms, which are in heavy concentrations in water and fat. As the atoms begin to settle back down from their briefly excited state, they give off a radio frequency, not unlike that of an FM station. Then the computer picks up the signal and translates it into physical images—a map, or topography, of the inside of the body. The technology isn’t great for looking at hard structures, like bone, but it’s extraordinary at imaging soft tissue, like organs. It’s an unprecedented tool for looking at the brain.

  When Reggie was little, he dreamed he’d play college basketball, or maybe coach. He’d have a family, for sure, but not just for its own sake; jock though he might have been, he was a romantic who wanted to fall in love, and to be in love. He hoped most of all to go on a Mormon mission. Then, one rainy morning in September 2006, while Reggie was driving to work on a mountain pass, life took a tragic, deadly turn. There was an accident, or so it seemed. Maybe it was just a moment of inattention, or something more insidious. Exactly what happened that last day of summer was not yet clear.

  Two men were dead, leaving behind extraordinary grief—and a mystery. The case attracted a handful of dogged investigators, including a headstrong Utah State Trooper. He became convinced that Reggie had caused the wreck because he’d been distracted by his cell phone, maybe texting. He pursued a stubborn probe, a lonely one at first, looking for evidence and proof of Reggie’s wrongdoing, but discovering only one obstacle after another. And, later, there was a victim’s advocate, a woman named Terryl Warner. She had survived a terrible childhood, one that toughened her and forged an uncompromising sense of duty she used to pursue justice for the crash’s victims.

  For his part, Reggie claimed not to remember what caused the crash. Then, as the evidence emerged, Reggie denied it, deceived himself, and was reinforced in his denial and deception by his most loving friends and family. Some members of the community, while sympathetic to the victims, couldn’t understand the fuss. So what if he’d looked at his phone, or texted—haven’t we all been distracted behind the wheel? Who knew that was so wrong? The law was no help: Nobody in Utah had ever been charged with such a crime.

  The accident became a catalyst. It spun together perspectives, philosophies, and lives—those of Reggie and his advocates, and Terryl and the other pursuers, including, ultimately, prosecutors, legislators, and top scientists. It forced people to confront their own truths, decades-old events, and secrets that helped mold them and their reactions—in some cases conflicted and in others overpowering—to this modern tragedy.

  And this maelstrom of forces left behind a stark reality. The tragedy was the product of a powerful dynamic, one that elite scientists have been scrambling to understand, even as it is intensifying. It is a clash between technology and the human brain.

  Broadly, technology is an outgrowth of the human mind. It is an extraordinary expression of innovation and potential. Modern-day machines serve us as virtual slaves and productivity tools. The value of such technology is inarguable in every facet of life—from national security and medicine to the most basic and intimate, like the way far-flung family and friends are nurtured and connected through miniature, ubiquitous phones; email that travels thousands of miles in seconds; or Skype and FaceTime. Fundamentally, the extraordinary pace at which consumers adopt t
hese programs and gadgets is not the product of marketing gimmicks or their cool factor but because of their extraordinary utility. They serve deep social cravings and needs.

  At the same time, such technology—from the television to the computer and phone—can put pressure on the brain by presenting it with more information, and of a type of information, that makes it hard for us to keep up. That is particularly true of interactive electronics, delivering highly relevant, stimulating social content, and with increasing speed. The onslaught taxes our ability to attend, to pay attention, arguably among the most important, powerful, and uniquely human of our gifts.

  As Reggie’s story unfolded, it illuminated and contributed to a thread of science dating to the 1850s, when scientists began to measure the capacities of the human brain—how we process information, how quickly, and how much of it. Prior to that time, the conventional wisdom was that people could react instantly. The idea was that the human brain was “infinite.” Machines began to change that thinking. Compared to, say, guns or trains or the telegraph, people’s reaction times didn’t seem so instant. Technology was making us look slow. But it was also allowing scientists to study the brain, creating an interesting trade-off; machines highlighted the limitations of the brain, threatened to stress our processing power and reaction time to the breaking point, but they also allowed scientists to understand and measure this dynamic.

  Then, around World War II, modern attention science was born, also prompted by people’s relationships to technology. A generation of pioneering researchers tried to figure out how much technology pilots could handle in the cockpit, and tried to measure when they became overloaded, and why. Or why radar operators, looking at cutting-edge computer displays, were sometimes unable to keep up with the blips that showed Nazi planes.

  In the second half of the twentieth century, high tech moved from the military and government to the consumer. First came radio, and then television (the demand for it growing explosively from 3.6 million sold in the United States in 1949 to an average of three per American home in 2010). Computers followed; the first mouse pioneered in the early 1960s, the personal computer a decade later. By the 1980s, the commercial mobile phone exceeded by orders of magnitude the capability of the world’s greatest military computer in World War II. And within a few years, it would be right there in the pocket.

  The developments were swift, the acceleration described by Moore’s law, which, in essence, talks of computer processing power doubling every two years. There was something else, a principle less celebrated than Moore’s law but of equal significance when it comes to understanding what is happening to the human brain. The axiom is called Metcalfe’s law. It was codified in the early 1990s, and it defines the power of a computer network by the number of people using it.

  More people, more communication, more value.

  More pressure.

  As networks became more populated and powerful, they added a huge wrinkle in the demand for attention by turning computers into personal communication devices. The technology was delivering not just data but information from friends and relatives—communications that could signal a business opportunity or a threat, an overture from a mate or a potential one. As such, the devices tapped into deep human needs—with increasing speed and interactivity. It was not just pure social communications, but video games, news, even shopping and consumption, a powerful, personalized electrical current connecting all of us, all of the time. This was the marriage of Moore and Metcalfe—the coming together of processing power and personal communications—our gadgets becoming faster and more intimate. They weren’t just demanding attention but had become so compelling as to be addictive.

  The modern attention researchers, walking a path laid down by their forebears 150 years earlier, asked a new question: Was technology no longer the slave, but the master? Was it overtaking our powers of attention? How could we take them back? It wasn’t just a question of life-or-death stuff, like the stakes for pilots in World War II. Now there were subtler tensions, the concept that nips and cuts at attention in the cubicle can take a persistent and low-grade toll on productivity, or in schools on focus, or at home on communication between lovers and parents and children. Would it hinder memory and learning rather than enhance it?

  Past technological advances, from the printing press to the radio and television, had invited questions about their unintended consequences and possible negative side effects. But many scholars agreed that these latest breakthroughs, taking full form only in the last decade, marked a difference in our lives in orders of magnitude.

  Technology was exploding in complexity and capability. How could we keep up?

  Reggie Shaw could not—keep up. He could not conceive of the larger dynamic, even the crisis, that had enveloped him. So maybe it’s no wonder he couldn’t grasp what had happened; perhaps this confusion prompted him to deceive himself and lie to others. Or was he less innocent than he was letting on? In any case, after being pressed by science and common sense, he no longer could keep the truth at bay and he recognized what he’d done, and he changed, completely. He became the unlikeliest of evangelists, a symbol of reckoning. And he began to transform the world with him. Broadly, his story, and that of others around him, became an era-defining lesson in how people can awaken from tragedy, confront reality, address even smaller daily dissonance, and use their experiences to make life better for themselves and the people around them. And their journey showed how we might come to terms with the mixed blessing of technology. For all the gifts of computer technology, if its power goes underappreciated, it can hijack the brain.

  Along the way, Reggie’s defenders and antagonists alike came to see themselves in the young man, a projection of how they would’ve handled themselves, or should. His attention, ours, is so fragile. What happened to him could happen to anyone, couldn’t it? Does that make him, or us, evil, ignorant, naive, or just human?

  Is his brain any different from ours?

  Ms. Johnson, the technician, hands Reggie two little plastic devices, gray, looking like primitive video game joysticks. She tells him that the gadgets have buttons he’ll be asked to press when certain images appear in the mirror. They’re going to see what Reggie’s brain looks like when he tries to pay attention.

  “I’m going to put you in slowly, Reggie,” says Ms. Johnson. “Is that okay?”

  Reggie clears his throat, a sign of his assent, an exhalation of nerves. He disappears into the tube.

  PART ONE

  COLLISION

  CHAPTER 1

  REGGIE

  IN EARLY JUNE 2006, nineteen-year-old Reggie Shaw sat in the backseat of a Chevy Tahoe heading north under a big, cloudless Utah sky. His father, Ed, a machine-shop manager, was crying quietly as he drove the white sport-utility vehicle. In the passenger seat, Reggie’s mother, Mary Jane, sobbed.

  Reggie was her little boy, her baby, at least until his little sister came along when Mary Jane was forty. Among her brood of six, Reggie was the quiet charmer, a peacemaker, sensitive with a dry wit, both athletic and awkward, honest. This time to a fault.

  A day earlier, Reggie had been sitting in a classroom in Provo at the Missionary Training Center. He was surrounded by eager teen Mormons, each preparing to embark on a mission, Reggie’s lifelong dream. He’d recently returned from his freshman year at a small Mormon college in Virginia, where he’d played basketball, and he was committed to taking the Mormon message to Winnipeg. But a secret nagged at him. He went to his president at the training center, and he confessed: He’d recently had sex with his girlfriend, Cammi.

  The fact that he’d previously lied about their coupling, and hadn’t done the spiritual work to put it behind him, ruled out his participation in the mission. Most horrifying to Reggie was the knowledge that the Church would soon phone his parents. The family lived in Tremonton, in the northernmost part of Utah. It had some of the heaviest concentration of Mormons in the state and, by extension, in the world. When someone came home ea
rly from a mission, everyone in the community knew about it, and people would suspect the reason. Even though the Shaws were well regarded, with deep roots, Reggie felt he’d marked not just himself, but his family.

  “It was difficult for them to drop me off knowing I wouldn’t be back for two years,” he says, looking back. “It was much more difficult to pick me up.” His dad was a quiet man, particularly if you didn’t know him well, someone who ached for his children when they hurt, even if he couldn’t quite express it. This was the first time Reggie could remember seeing him cry.

  Reggie uttered hardly a word as they wound their way through Salt Lake City on I-15 North. It was nearly seven p.m. The sun, falling in the west, to the left of the Chevy, snuck into the car at an insidious angle, causing Reggie to squint. He had a short haircut, leaving a touch of bangs in the front. His young face usually projected kindness, approachability, but now held heavy weight he had no language to express.

  In the distance, to the right of the car, in the east, rose the Wasatch Range of the Rocky Mountains. The imposing jagged peaks put the topography out of balance, almost tilting the land in their direction; the mountains had a gravity that helped define the state, outline it, just as they would come to define Reggie.

  The family continued north, passing through Salt Lake City, things and places blurring—the auto mall, McDonald’s, Best Buy, the exit for the University of Utah. As they drove, Reggie thought about Cammi, and wondered what would become of them, and her, of him.

  Less than an hour later, they arrived at the two-story, red-brick home in Tremonton, the town where Reggie had grown up, and his mom had, too. Her family had raised sugar beets, cattle, hay, and corn. Lots of land, few people. Everyone still knew everyone. By 2006, there were fewer than six thousand residents. Down the block from the Shaws lived the town’s mayor; kitty-corner from the mayor lived their LDS bishop. They were all within walking distance from Reggie’s elementary, middle, and high schools, from the Little League field his dad had helped care for, and the recreation center where Reggie first learned to play his great passion.